Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 633/2024

Case between Rosy Thomas vs C.V.Augustine et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rosy Thomas filed a suit against C.V. Augustine and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Rosy Thomas was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Rosy Thomas was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not press the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not press the case.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff did not press the memo seen filed by the counsel.

Judgment Evidence:

the Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rosy Thomas
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.V.Augustine
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.V.Varghese George
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Molly Babu Mary
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cicily Reena
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahelamma
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Khadeeja Rishbath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashish Gopal K.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sheeja Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sailakshmi S.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sonith Thomas Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Likhitha E.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Not press memo seen filed by the counsel for the plaintiff. Hence, the Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rosy Thomas vs C.V.Augustine et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Rosy Thomas vs C.V.Augustine et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won