Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 633/2024

Case between Rosy Thomas vs C.V.Augustine et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rosy Thomas filed a suit against C.V. Augustine and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Rosy Thomas was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not press the case.

Judgment Evidence:

the Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rosy Thomas (60 years years) Vazayil house, Thalavady P.O, Alappuzha District, Pin – 689 572

Defendants

C.V.Augustine (72 years years) Chakkalakkal house, church road end, Millenium road, Palarivattom P.O, Poonithura village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 025 C.V.Varghese George (71 years years) Chakkalakkal house, Thammanam P.O, Poonithura village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 032 Molly Babu Mary (62 years years) Chakkalakkal house, Thammanam P.O, Poonithura village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 032 Cicily Reena (54 years years) Platinum Crown Flat no. 2B, Edapally, Unichira, Thrikkakara, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 032 Rahelamma (67 years years) Chakkalakkal house, Thammanam P.O, Poonithura village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 032

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Not press memo seen filed by the counsel for the plaintiff. Hence, the Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases