Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.2114/2023

Case between Rosily.R et al vs Marykutty Thomas regarding petition to strike off defendant.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-02-13
Duration
Case Code No.
2114
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by the 2nd defendant, Marykutty Thomas, to be struck off from the party array in a suit filed by Rosily.R and others for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunctions. The court determined that the presence of the 2nd defendant was not necessary for the adjudication of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to strike off the 2nd defendant from the party array was allowed by the court, determining that the 2nd defendant's presence was not necessary for the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to strike off the 2nd defendant from the party array was allowed by the court, determining that the 2nd defendant's presence was not necessary for the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the 2nd defendant was improperly joined and her presence was not necessary for the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The presence of 2nd defendant is not necessary to enable this court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and the name of 2nd defendant is struck off from the party array.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rosily.R
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o Y.Soman
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kanakaraj
Relation
S/o Selvaraj
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manju.K.Jeevan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Marykutty Thomas
Relation
W/o Roy Looke
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajaprathap.S.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rohit Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S. Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreenath.S.Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. R.Kavitha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Bhagavath Singh.C.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Arya.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The name of 2nd defendant is struck off from the party array.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed and the name of 2nd defendant is struck off from the party array.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won