Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 206/2015

Case between Romy Jacob vs John Daries et al regarding Suit Rejection

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Romy Jacob filed a suit against several defendants regarding a civil matter. The plaintiff and defendants were both absent and the suit was subsequently rejected.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit as both the plaintiff and the defendants were absent. No BCF was paid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit Rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Romy Jacob (48 years years) Thekkekara house, Door, No. C.C 28/3286, chilavannoor desom, Elamkulam village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 020

Defendants

John Daries (52 years years) house no. 288/(9/176) of Cheranelloor Panchayath, Kolarikkal house, South Chittior P.O, Cheranelloor village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District Anony Santhosh (48 years years) house no. 288/(9/176) of Cheranelloor Panchayath, Kolarikkal house, South Chittior P.O, Cheranelloor village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District Ammini Manuel (78 years years) house no. 288/(9/176) of Cheranelloor Panchayath, Kolarikkal house, South Chittoor P.O, Cheranelloor village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District M.V.Francis (72 years years) Muzhangumthara house, Korambadam desom, Kadamakudy village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam district Cherian Varghese (66 years years) House no. 27/1282, A-14, Concert O Castle 4B, Panampilly Nagar, Ernakulam village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. No BCF paid. Hence, Suit Rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases