Case Summary
The case involves Rohini Lease and General Financiers as the petitioner and Muhammad Aslam as the respondent. The petitioner proceeded exparte due to the absence of the respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The exparte application was allowed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not appear in court.
The respondent did not appear in court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not appear in court.
The respondent did not appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner represented. Notice served to respondent. Called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
EA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rohini Lease and General Financiers
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammad Aslam
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sunil Kumar K P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammad Aslam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rohini Lease and General Financiers vs Muhammad Aslam regarding exparte petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Rohini Lease and General Financiers vs Muhammad Aslam regarding exparte petition.