Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.981/2021

Case between Rince Johns vs M.V Jose, Shaly Jose regarding suit dismissal

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rince Johns is the plaintiff, and M.V Jose and Shaly Jose are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being represented. As a result, the court found that there was no interest from the plaintiff to continue the matter.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being represented. As a result, the court found that there was no interest from the plaintiff to continue the matter.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rince Johns
Party Age
28
Relation
s/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V Jose
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaly Jose
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Stejo K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.P. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
plaintiff absent, no representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rince Johns vs M.V Jose, Shaly Jose regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Rince Johns vs M.V Jose, Shaly Jose regarding suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won