Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.821/2023

Case between Rijun N. vs S.M. Dileep Kumar et al regarding rent dispute

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Rijun N., filed a suit against defendants S.M. Dileep Kumar and Alias Paul concerning the non-payment of rent. The court found that the plaintiff failed to comply with previous orders regarding payment of arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with orders regarding the payment of rent arrears. The plaintiff remained absent throughout the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with orders regarding the payment of rent arrears. The plaintiff remained absent throughout the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with the court's orders and failed to show sufficient cause for non-payment.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not comply with the court's orders and failed to show sufficient cause for non-payment.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff having failed to comply with the order in IA 8/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing the license fee in liable to suffer consequence as held by the Hon'ble High Court in the above decision.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rijun N.
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.M. Dileep Kumar
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alias Paul
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Siyad M.F
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed due to non-compliance with the order to remit monthly license fee arrears.
Evidence:
Therefore, the suit is only liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rijun N. vs S.M. Dileep Kumar et al regarding rent dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Rijun N. vs S.M. Dileep Kumar et al regarding rent dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won