Case Summary
Revathy.L filed a suit against Anil.M and Sareena regarding the payment of court fees. The case was finally heard and the court ruled that the plaintiff's suit stands rejected due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit was rejected due to failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint stands rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Revathy.L
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil.M
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sareena
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Jayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.P.Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B. Pradeep kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's suit stands rejected due to no balance court fee being remitted.
Evidence:
Hence Plaint stands rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021