Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 530/2022

Case between Retro Classics Private Limited vs Plaggio Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. regarding rejection of suit

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is Retro Classics Private Limited, represented by its Managing Director Paul Abey. The suit is regarding the rejection of the plaintiff's case due to absence and non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has rejected the plaintiff's suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the failure to pay the required court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has rejected the plaintiff's suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the failure to pay the required court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and court fees were not paid.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and court fees were not paid.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, represented. BCF not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 04th day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Retro Classics Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paul Abey
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Plaggio Vehicles Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by it Authorised person
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Plaggio Vehicles Pvt Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G.Rajeesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandra Sunny
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Kumar M.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to their absence and BCF not paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. BCF not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Retro Classics Private Limited vs Plaggio Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Retro Classics Private Limited vs Plaggio Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. regarding rejection of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won