Case Summary
The case involves Reshmi A, the petitioner, seeking possession of a rental property from Vimal Arakkal, the tenant. The court determined that the tenant failed to comply with previous rent payment orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has ordered the tenant to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with previous orders regarding rent payment. The proceedings have been closed as the tenant did not show sufficient cause for non-payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The tenant failed to comply with the court's orders regarding rent payment.
The tenant failed to comply with the court's orders regarding rent payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 04/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reshmi A
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vimal Arakkal
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance submitted by petitioner.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswani Thuvvakkadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hena V. Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suresh Babu V.C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Liya Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vinay N.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vani S. Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reshmi A vs Vimal Arakkal regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Reshmi A vs Vimal Arakkal regarding Rent Control Petition