Case Summary
Renuka Devi filed a review petition against the order closing IA No.10/2022 without sending her thumb impression for FSL verification. Bhasurangi and others are the counter petitioners arguing that the review petition is not maintainable as adequate opportunities were given to the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition filed by the plaintiff, stating that there was no error in the order closing IA No.10/2022. The plaintiff had not produced a contemporaneous document despite multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants contended the review petition was not maintainable due to no error apparent in closing IA No.10/2022.
The defendants contended the review petition was not maintainable due to no error apparent in closing IA No.10/2022.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that there is no error apparent on the face of record, or any mistake in the order dated 19/03/2024 as it was made on the basis of order dated 31/08/2022.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Renuka Devi
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhasurangi
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudharma Devi
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.V. Mahadevan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remya Jayaram
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Cherunniyoor C.S. Vijayachandran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.S. Sukumaran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Review
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to review the order closing IA No.10/2022.
Evidence:
Therefore, this court is of the view that the present petition cannot be entertained and in the result, the petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff argues that this document is forged and seeks its production for verification.
Reference:
Sale Deed No.2399 of 1999
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff's case involves setting aside this document.
Reference:
Sale Deed No.836 of 2003
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff's case involves setting aside this document.
Reference:
Sale Deed No.838 of 2003
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Testimonies presented by the plaintiff regarding the authenticity of the documents.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Renuka Devi vs Bhasurangi et al regarding review of order closing IA No.10/2022
Case Code Year
Case between Renuka Devi vs Bhasurangi et al regarding review of order closing IA No.10/2022