Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1194/2019

Case between Renu Thomas vs Sunil Kumar Thankappan regarding realization of money

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-27
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Renu Thomas filed a suit against Sunil Kumar Thankappan for the realization of a sum of Rs. 4,70,000/- which she claims was paid for the registration of an apartment. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant misappropriated the funds and failed to fulfill his agreement to repay the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the suit due to lack of evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims. The court noted inconsistencies in the plaintiff's case and failure to prove the alleged debt.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff could not substantiate her claims with sufficient documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Renu Thomas (Age not specified years) Cheruthitta house, South Janatha Road, Palarivattom, Kochi – 682 017

Defendants

Sunil Kumar Thankappan (Age not specified years) Kurukanadhan, Ashoka Road, Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff requested to recover a sum of Rs. 4,70,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the suit is found to be devoid of merits and is only liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as evidence of the initial sale agreement for the apartment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as evidence of the legal registration of the apartment in plaintiff's name.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is the agreement acknowledging the repayment terms established between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Agreement with defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It provides a copy of the agreement that outlines the repayment plan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is the complaint lodged against the defendant regarding his failure to repay the amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is the legal notice sent to the defendant demanding repayment of the owed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as proof of the dispatch of the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Original acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is proof of receipt confirmation of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases