Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1621/2019

Case between Remani vs Radhika regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-12
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Remani, the plaintiff, filed a suit which was dismissed due to lack of representation over several court postings. Radhika is the defendant in this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for lack of representation from the plaintiff's side.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to represent the case despite multiple postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 01/2021 is dismissed for default. Accordingly suit is also dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Remani (65 years) Kaithamanaparambil (H) Nettoor, Maradu P.O., ernakulam, Pin-682040

Defendants

Radhika (35 years) Kottilamcheril House, Kumbalam P.O., Kumbalam Village, Panangadu, Ernakulam District­682 506

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
There is no representation for the petitioner for the last several postings from 06.12.2022 onwards. ... Hence IA 01/2021 is dismissed for default. Accordingly suit is also dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases