Case Summary
The case involves plaintiffs Remani M.A, Amal dev P. R, and Anooja P. R claiming ownership over a property. They allege that the defendants, Jayapalan P.S and Jayashankar.PS, have unlawfully encroached upon their property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court concluded that the suit was not properly valued based on the arguments presented regarding the valuation of the property.
The court concluded that the suit was not properly valued based on the arguments presented regarding the valuation of the property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The Issue No. I is found as against the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Remani M.A (66 years years)
Pulpara house, Panangad P.O., Kumbalam village, Kanayannur taluk Ernakulam, Pin code 682 506
Amal dev P. R (32 years years)
Pulpara house, Panangad P.O, Kumbalam village, Kanayannur taluk Ernakulam, Pin code 682 506
Anooja P. R. (30 years years)
Pulpara house, Panangad P.O, Kumbalam village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam, Pin code 682 506
Defendants
Jayapalan P.S (42 years years)
Pulpara house, Panangad P.O., Kumbalam village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam, Pin code 682 506
Jayashankar.PS (35 years years)
Pulpana house, Pamangad P.O, Kumibulum village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam, Pin code 682 506
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff directed to furnish fresh valuation and pay deficit court fees.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is therefore directed under Section 12 (2) of the Act to amend the plaint incorporating the proper valuation and proper market value of the properties and pay the deficit court fees before 11.03.2025.