Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 730/2023

Case between Rema Smrithi V K vs Deena Mathew et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Rema Smrithi V K as the plaintiff and Deena Mathew and others as defendants, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants also filed a counterclaim for a mandatory injunction to demolish unauthorized construction by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the properties in dispute and obtain necessary information for fair adjudication.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and report on the matter.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it essential to appoint a commissioner to ensure a fair adjudication based on the evidence concerning the property at issue.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate Jineeshlal S.B is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rema Smrithi V K (48 years) Moothedath, Anagha, Diwans Road, Ernakulam, Kochi- 682001

Defendants

Deena Mathew (54 years) 3B Santhi Seaview Apartments, R Madhavan Nair Road, Ravipuram, Kochi- 682015 Abraham Joseph (55 years) 7B, Santhi Seaview Apartments, R Madhavan Nair Road, Ravipuram, Kochi- 682015 Pallavi Abraham (53 years) 7B, Santhi Seaview Apartments, R Madhavan Nair Road, Ravipuram, Kochi- 682015

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of an expert Engineer to collect valuable inputs regarding the construction made beyond the extent provided in the title deed.
Evidence:
the court is satisfied that it is essential to appoint an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of an expert engineer to collect valuable inputs as to the building in plaint schedule property and the construction made beyond the extent provided in the title deed for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit on merits.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases