Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1139/2018

Case between Rema M.P vs P.P.Ramachandran et al regarding civil suit dismissal

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Rema M.P, initiated a suit against the defendants including P.P.Ramachandran and the Jewel Arcade Owners Association. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The application for removal from the list was found to have no merits.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The application for removal from the list was found to have no merits.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear in court and provide adequate representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear in court and provide adequate representation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and not represented, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Since no medical certificate was produced in support of IA 2/25, IA 2/25 is found to be of no merits. Hence IA 2/25 is dismissed. Resultantly, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rema M.P
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.P.Ramachandran
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jewel Arcade Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abraham
Relation
Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical certificate for IA 2/25
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.M.Benzir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Philip T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shubha Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandeep S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashitha S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joan Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vigneswar Sidharthan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suneethi S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nandagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.K.Muhammed Rauf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
IA 2/25 was seeking removal for the list, but was found to have no merits.
Evidence:
Since no medical certificate was produced in support of IA 2/25, IA 2/25 is found to be of no merits. Hence IA 2/25 is dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Resultantly, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rema M.P vs P.P.Ramachandran et al regarding civil suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Rema M.P vs P.P.Ramachandran et al regarding civil suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 05/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won