Case Summary
Rekha Sunil Roy is the plaintiff seeking a prohibitory injunction against M N Kannanunni and others. The case involves a dispute over parking spaces in their apartment complex.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to carry out the amendment as sought for within 14 days.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for amendment of the plaint, permitting the addition of new pleadings regarding the parking dispute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the amendment to be consequential and necessary for a fair disposal of the case.
The court found the amendment to be consequential and necessary for a fair disposal of the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the amendment to be consequential and necessary for a fair disposal of the case.
The court found the amendment to be consequential and necessary for a fair disposal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that for the fair disposal of the case, the above said amendment should be permitted to be incorporated.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result 1) The above petition is allowed on costs of Rs.1,000/-. 2) Plaintiff is permitted to carry out the amendment as sought for within 14 days.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rekha Sunil Roy
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M N Kannanunni
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suchetha Kannan
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Head – Customer Relations, M/s Desai Homes
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- DD Platinum Planet Apartment Owners Association
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anesh Chandrank
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jhonson Gomez
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N Retheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suma Retheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aravind Ajith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Binu Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishna Priya T M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mahesh Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M P Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Deepak S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajesh K Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The above petition is allowed on costs of Rs.1,000/-.
Evidence:
In the result 1)The above petition is allowed on costs of Rs.1,000/-.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is permitted to carry out the amendment as sought for within 14 days.
Evidence:
2)Plaintiff is permitted to carry out the amendment as sought for within 14 days.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rekha Sunil Roy vs M N Kannanunni et al regarding prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rekha Sunil Roy vs M N Kannanunni et al regarding prohibitory injunction