Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.977/2022

Case between Rekha Sebi vs Mrs. Rosalind John, Mrs. Tissia Thomas regarding undervaluation of plaint claim

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-09-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months
Case Closed
Mon, 09/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Rekha Sebi and defendants Mrs. Rosalind John and Mrs. Tissia Thomas regarding the undervaluation of a plaint claim. The court rejected the plaint due to non-compliance with previous orders.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to rectify the undervaluation as ordered previously.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to rectify the undervaluation as ordered previously.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not comply with the court's orders regarding the valuation of the plaint.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not comply with the court's orders regarding the valuation of the plaint.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was directed to remit the balance court fee payable since the counsel for the plaintiff admits that valuation of plaint claim as undervalued and seeks time for remitting the same.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence for the above stated reasons, the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rekha Sebi
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Rosalind John
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Tissia Thomas
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jeemon P. Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Parvathy Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. VinodKumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.K. Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of CPC.
Evidence:
Hence for the above stated reasons, the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rekha Sebi vs Mrs. Rosalind John, Mrs. Tissia Thomas regarding undervaluation of plaint claim
Case Code Year
Case between Rekha Sebi vs Mrs. Rosalind John, Mrs. Tissia Thomas regarding undervaluation of plaint claim

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won