Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 627/2020

Case between Reema Jose vs Robin Thomas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Reema Jose seeking a declaration of her right to use a property for access to her land from her brother, Robin Thomas. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has threatened to block her access, prompting this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared the plaintiff's right to use a property as a means for ingress and egress to her land and issued a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent obstructions.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her right of easement of necessity over the property needed for access.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: i.The plaintiff is entitled to get a declaration that she has the right to use the plaint C schedule property as a way for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property for its beneficial enjoyment in all lawful means.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Reema Jose (49 years) Arakkal House, Vadhyar Road, Kathrikadavu, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Pin-682 017

Defendants

Robin Thomas (50 years) Valiyaparambil House, House No. 64/2245 (Old No. 36/2587), St. Francis Xavier Church Road, Kathrikadavu, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Pin-682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is granted a declaration to use plaint C schedule property for ingress and egress to plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to get a declaration that she has the right to use the plaint C schedule property as a way for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property for its beneficial enjoyment in all lawful means.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction granted to restrain the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of plaint C schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant and his men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from doing anything so as to defeat the right of the plaintiff over plaint C schedule property and from obstructing the plaintiff in his peaceful possession and use of plaint C schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No.3655/2019 establishing plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 18.06.2020 supporting plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No.3674/1999 related to the defendant's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition deed No.2955/1989 establishing the family background of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report dated 09.09.2020 confirming the existence of the plaint C schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/22/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases