Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
IA No. 10/2024

Case between RDS Oasis Owners Association et al vs Dr.Paul K Mathew et al regarding petition to lift attachment

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition to lift attachment in O.S No. 1148/2017

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Petition to accept written statement of defendants 1 and 2 dismissed
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition under Order 38 Rule 9 & section 151 of CPC
Final Judgment
No
Petition to accept written statement of defendants 1 and 2 dismissed
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr.Paul K Mathew
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Commander C Dayanand
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V.Joy
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o late
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod Mathew Jacob
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Giby Mathew
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RDS Oasis Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.V.Ramesh
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioners/Defendants
Advocate Name
Prakash P George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioners/Defendants
Advocate Name
Abhijith M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Respondents/Plaintiffs
Advocate Name
Paul K Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondents/Plaintiffs
Advocate Name
Jalaludeen Mohammed K.P.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Respondents/Plaintiffs
Advocate Name
Arun K.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Respondents/Plaintiffs
Advocate Name
Blaze K Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Attachment Lifting
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition to lift the attachment was dismissed
Evidence:
The petition to accept the written statement of the defendant no. 1 and 2 as stated in the petition is dismissed. Also, the month of December is already over. So there is no reasons prevailing for allowing this petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Petition under Order 38 Rule 9 & section 151 of CPC
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between RDS Oasis Owners Association et al vs Dr.Paul K Mathew et al regarding petition to lift attachment
Case Code Year
Case between RDS Oasis Owners Association et al vs Dr.Paul K Mathew et al regarding petition to lift attachment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won