Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.998/2024

Case between R.Chandrika Devi vs Saranya.M.S et al regarding impleadment in a suit for recovery of Rs.50,000.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-04-09
Duration
Case Code No.
998
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, R.Chandrika Devi, seeks to be added as a party in a suit filed by Saranya.M.S and others for recovering Rs.50,000 based on a lease agreement. The petitioner claims the original plaintiff lacks legal standing as she lent the money to the deceased husband of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application of R.Chandrika Devi to be added as a party in the recovery suit. It concluded that the addition of the petitioner would complicate the case without addressing the relief sought.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application of R.Chandrika Devi to be added as a party in the recovery suit. It concluded that the addition of the petitioner would complicate the case without addressing the relief sought.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the petitioner had no financial transaction with the original defendants and that no relief was sought against her.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The impleading petitioner has no financial transaction with original defendant. So also no relief is sought against the impleading petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this I.A stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saranya.M.S
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rupesh.G
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajitha.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R.Chandrika Devi
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Anilkumar.V.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Suhas Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Balaram Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Amy Appukuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Mohammed Anas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth.S.Pillai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought to be impleaded as a party to the suit.
Evidence:
Thus for the aforesaid reasons, I find that on impleadment of the party proposed as additional defendant, additional issues would arise in the suit and those issues may not be necessary to be adjudicated in the present suit as far as the reliefs sought by the plaintiff in the suit are concerned.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won