Case Summary
Multiple petitioners filed a case seeking eviction of the respondent from a property rented for a chicken stall and claiming bonafide need for starting a crockery shop.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order and cost payment
Case Type
Eviction Case - Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property within one month and pay the petitioner's costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established bonafide need for eviction to start a crockery shop and the respondent failed to defend the claims.
The petitioners established bonafide need for eviction to start a crockery shop and the respondent failed to defend the claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established bonafide need for eviction to start a crockery shop and the respondent failed to defend the claims.
The petitioners established bonafide need for eviction to start a crockery shop and the respondent failed to defend the claims.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent opted to remain exparte, making the evidence adduced by the petitioners remain unchallenged.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rayin Haji
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidali
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Proof affidavit, Copy of Registered Lawyer Notice
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the property within one month and cost payment by the respondent.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of notice issued to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction Case - Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Bonafide need for business establishment
Case Code
Case between Rayin Haji et al vs Saidali regarding eviction for crockery shop
Case Code Year
Case between Rayin Haji et al vs Saidali regarding eviction for crockery shop