Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 10/2022

Case between Raveendran Nair vs Bindhu Jitheesh regarding Balance Court Fee

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-06-06
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 06/06/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Raveendran Nair filed a suit against Bindhu Jitheesh regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The court found that the plaintiff did not provide sufficient reasons to grant more time for payment.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to non-remittance of balance court fees despite multiple opportunities provided.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to non-remittance of balance court fees despite multiple opportunities provided.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee despite being granted several chances.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee despite being granted several chances.
Supporting Evidence
No cogent reason shown to grant time for Balance Court Fee, as innumerable chances are granted and posted for Balance Court Fee as last chance no further time.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint therefore rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendran Nair
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu Jitheesh
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Mani V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayan T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jackson Johny
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sethulakshmi K.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Diana Lavanie Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manu Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eliswa Saritha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remittance of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Plaint therefore rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raveendran Nair vs Bindhu Jitheesh regarding Balance Court Fee
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran Nair vs Bindhu Jitheesh regarding Balance Court Fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/06/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won