Case Summary
Raveendran Nair C is involved in a dispute against A.G.Geetha and others regarding allegations of forceful eviction. The case seeks to prevent the defendants from evicting the plaintiff without due legal process.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The 1st defendant and their men are restrained from forcefully ousting or evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule building.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff satisfactorily proved his possession and apprehension of forceful dispossession by the first defendant.
The plaintiff satisfactorily proved his possession and apprehension of forceful dispossession by the first defendant.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows. 1) The 1st defendant and their men and agents are restrained from forcefully ousting or evicting the plaintiff and his staff from the plaint schedule building without due process of law...
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Raveendran Nair C (54 years years)
Cholakkal house, Neeleswaram P.O, Pin – 673 572, Omassery, Kozhikode District
Defendants
A.G.Geetha (54 years years)
‘Paliyam’ Parlikad P.O, Parlikad village, Thalappilly Taluk, Thrissur District
C.V.Valsala (55 years years)
Aiswarya Buildings, 39/4171-A (UA), S.A.Road, Valanjambalam, Kochi – 682 016
Dr.C.V.Soumini (51 years years)
Aiswarya Buildings, 39/4171-A (UA), S.A.Road, Valanjambalam, Kochi – 682 016
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against forceful eviction.
Evidence:
1st defendant and their men and agents are restrained from forcefully ousting or evicting the plaintiff and his staff from the plaint schedule building without due process of law.
Relief Type:
Cost
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the 1st defendant.
Evidence:
1st defendant is also liable to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's request for an injunction against defendants 2 and 3 was partly granted.
Evidence:
The court is not in favour of granting an equitable relief as sought for against defendants No. 2 and 3.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the rent agreement between the plaintiff and defendants 2 and 3.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Judgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the certified copy of the judgment in a related suit O.S. No. 276/2016 which supports the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Agreement Deed
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document is referenced by the defendants to assert their claims regarding ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type:
Lease Deed
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document is used by the defendants to argue the legality of their ownership claim.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This report supports the plaintiff's possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1