Case Summary
The case involves Raveendran and Prasanna Raveendran as petitioners and Sanal Kumari as the counter petitioner. The petitioners sought an amendment to their original petition, which the court found liable to be allowed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the amendment petition sought by the petitioners. The court ordered that the amendment be carried out within 7 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the ancillary prayers in the petition justifiable based on the lack of objections.
The court found the ancillary prayers in the petition justifiable based on the lack of objections.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Only ancillary prayers sought in this petition, which seems liable to be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed. Carry out amendment within 7 days, from the date of order.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raveendran
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna Raveendran
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanal Kumari
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. R. Anandakuttan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Devika D Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ancillary prayers sought in this petition
Evidence:
Only ancillary prayers sought in this petition, which seems liable to be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022