Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.639/2015

Case between Ratheesh.B et al vs Santhosh.V et al regarding compromise petition

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-04-02
Duration
approximately-10 years 11 months 0 days
Case Closed
Wed, 04/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Ratheesh.B, Rejani, and Anilkumar.B filed a suit against the defendants Santhosh.V, Priya, and others. A compromise petition was filed and found to be lawful, leading to the decree in terms of the compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties, which was found to be lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the compromise petition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties, which was found to be lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise petition were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise petition were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise petition found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise. The compromise petition shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ratheesh.B
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rejani
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar.B
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh.V
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Priya
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrika
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhash.S
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun I Sreedhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Malayinkeezhu V.S. Ratheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ratheesh.B et al vs Santhosh.V et al regarding compromise petition
Case Code Year
Case between Ratheesh.B et al vs Santhosh.V et al regarding compromise petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 05/02/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 04/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won