Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.850/2022

Case between Rashid A. et al vs Shiyam H. regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Rashid A. and Shameer R. brought a suit against the defendant Shiyam H. The case involved the plaintiffs' continuous absence from court hearings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs from court hearings despite being called multiple times.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rashid A. (29 years) T.C No.69/2704, Samadhana Junction, Manikkamvilakam, Poonthura, Thiruvananthapuram Pin­695026. Shameer R. (30 years) T.C.42/937, (7)ANRA 48 Pulari Building, Asha Nagar, Vallakkadavu P.O., Thiruvananthapuram­695008.

Defendants

Shiyam H. (33 years) TC No.35/913, ShiyamManzil, Puthen Road Jn., Thiruvnanthapuram­695008.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases