Case Summary
Plaintiffs filed a suit for realization of money, which was dismissed due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Suit rejection under Order VII Rule 11
Case Type
Money Realization Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for money realization was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA. 805/2018 dismissed. Since Balance court fee not paid. Plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raramkandath Aboobacker
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raramkandath Jouharali
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money Realization
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for realization of money
Evidence:
IA. 805/2018 dismissed. Since Balance court fee not paid. Plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Money Realization Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raramkandath Aboobacker et al vs Raramkandath Jouharali et al regarding money realization
Case Code Year
Case between Raramkandath Aboobacker et al vs Raramkandath Jouharali et al regarding money realization