Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 906/2019

Case between Raphael @ Gabriel vs Antony et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-09-07
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 09/07/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by Raphael @ Gabriel against Antony and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present and not ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present and not ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raphael @ Gabriel
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini James
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alex Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sangeeth C.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinod M.B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. K Aboobacker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T. B Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.T Harikumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana K.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashish Vidyadharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and unreadiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raphael @ Gabriel vs Antony et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Raphael @ Gabriel vs Antony et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 09/07/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won