Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P No. 307/2018 in O.P No. 281/2017

Case between Ramya T.R vs M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited regarding execution of award

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ramya T.R, the decree holder, filed an execution petition against M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited, the judgment debtor, regarding the execution of an award. The court examined whether the execution petition was maintainable given the absence of required permission from the Supreme Court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed as not maintainable due to the lack of necessary permission from the Hon'ble Supreme Court as stipulated in the award.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as not maintainable due to the lack of necessary permission from the Hon'ble Supreme Court as stipulated in the award.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was ruled as not maintainable.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition was ruled as not maintainable.
Supporting Evidence
In the absence of such permission as has been mandated in the award that is sought to be executed, I am of the opinion that the EP, for the prayers that is sought for now in the EP, is not maintainable and hence it cannot be proceeded with.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, EP stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramya T.R
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited
Relation
Rep. by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Cherian Karipparambil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Cherian Karipparambil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Execution petition is not maintainable.
Evidence:
In the absence of such permission as has been mandated in the award that is sought to be executed, I am of the opinion that the EP, for the prayers that is sought for now in the EP, is not maintainable and hence it cannot be proceeded with.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramya T.R vs M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited regarding execution of award
Case Code Year
Case between Ramya T.R vs M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited regarding execution of award

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mrs. New India Engineering Stores vs National Tools Palace et al regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Maya Printers et al vs Afsal B regarding decree execution
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won