Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
E.P No. 307/2018 in O.P No. 281/2017

Case between Ramya T.R vs M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited regarding execution of award

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ramya T.R, the decree holder, filed an execution petition against M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited, the judgment debtor, regarding the execution of an award. The court examined whether the execution petition was maintainable given the absence of required permission from the Supreme Court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed as not maintainable due to the lack of necessary permission from the Hon'ble Supreme Court as stipulated in the award.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was ruled as not maintainable.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, EP stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ramya T.R (35 years years) 12/172, Suramya, Vazhakkala, Kakkanad, Thrikkakara West P.O, Kochi – 682 030, Ernakulam

Defendants

M/s. Sahara Prime City Limited (Age not specified years) Sahara Grace, Sea Port Airport road, Chittettukara, Kakkanad, Kochi – 682 037

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Execution petition is not maintainable.
Evidence:
In the absence of such permission as has been mandated in the award that is sought to be executed, I am of the opinion that the EP, for the prayers that is sought for now in the EP, is not maintainable and hence it cannot be proceeded with.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases