Case Summary
Ramla along with others filed a petition against Kamalam and others for default of payment. The petition was dismissed for default as the necessary fee was not paid to issue notice to respondents 2, 6, and 7.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to non-payment of the necessary fee to issue notice to certain respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No batta paid to issue notice to Respondents 2, 6 and 7. The petitioner failed to pay batta to issue those respondents on last posting date also.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramla
- Party Age
- 34
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Relation
- Guardian of Kadeeja
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kamalam
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nirmala
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prakasan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prabhakaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sindhu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Unknown
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
No documentary evidence mentioned.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015