Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 465/2025

Case between Ramesh K B vs Jomon Rajan regarding ad interim injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration
Case Code No.
465
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ramesh K B filed a petition for ad interim injunction against Jomon Rajan. The case involves preventing the defendant from forcefully taking possession of certain machines.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the petitioner, preventing the defendant from taking possession of the machines.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted to restrain the defendant from taking possession of the machines.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the petitioner, preventing the defendant from taking possession of the machines.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case has been made out, and any delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the application.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case has been made out, and any delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the application.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule machines from the plaintiff until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramesh K B
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jomon Rajan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bobby John K A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amala Ann Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Asha Antony
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashly Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction is granted restraining the respondent from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule machines from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule machines from the plaintiff until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won