Case Summary
Plaintiff Ramachandran filed a suit against defendant Yahiya for money and attachment. Plaintiff later stated in court that the suit was not being pressed, leading to the suit being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the suit
Case Type
Original Suit - Money and Attachment
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff stated in court that the suit was not being pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff filed statement, stating not pressing the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed. Attachment order passed and IA 1535/2016 is hereby lifted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramachandran
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yahiya
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o Hamza
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money and Attachment
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for money and attachment was dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed statement, stating not pressing the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit - Money and Attachment
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramachandran vs Yahiya regarding money and attachment
Case Code Year
Case between Ramachandran vs Yahiya regarding money and attachment