Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1281/2015

Case between Ramachandran vs Vincent Thomas regarding suit for damages.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 03/02/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ramachandran filed a suit against Vincent Thomas concerning the cutting down of a subject matter tree. The suit has been dismissed as infructuous but the plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as infructuous but awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of the suit to be realized from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as infructuous but awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was dismissed as infructuous but justice demands that the plaintiff recover costs.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was dismissed as infructuous but justice demands that the plaintiff recover costs.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that justice demands the plaintiff be entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as infructuous. Considering the facts of the case, time and expenses involved, justice demands that costs be allowed to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramachandran
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o late Damodaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vincent Thomas
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o Thomas
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sojo.J.Kallidukkil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishwanath Salish
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jijo Isaac
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of suit from defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the facts of the case, time and expenses involved, justice demands that costs be allowed to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramachandran vs Vincent Thomas regarding suit for damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Ramachandran vs Vincent Thomas regarding suit for damages.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/02/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won