Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1281/2015

Case between Ramachandran vs Vincent Thomas regarding suit for damages.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ramachandran filed a suit against Vincent Thomas concerning the cutting down of a subject matter tree. The suit has been dismissed as infructuous but the plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as infructuous but awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of the suit to be realized from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was dismissed as infructuous but justice demands that the plaintiff recover costs.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as infructuous. Considering the facts of the case, time and expenses involved, justice demands that costs be allowed to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ramachandran (61 years) Chaliyakodath House, House No. XXXII/2228-B, Palarivattom desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayanoor Taluk

Defendants

Vincent Thomas (62 years) Karishma Cottage, Near Calavath Road, Palarivattom Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannoor Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of suit from defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the facts of the case, time and expenses involved, justice demands that costs be allowed to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases