Case Summary
The complainant, Raju, and the accused, Sajitha, were involved in a case under the N.I. Act. The matter was settled and the complaint was withdrawn.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted and the complaint was allowed to be withdrawn.
Key Reasoning:
The matter was settled between the parties.
The matter was settled between the parties.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the withdrawal of the complaint.
Judgment Evidence:
CMP 17/2025 allowed. Accused acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raju
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajitha
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B.L. Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kundara Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raju vs Sajitha regarding offence U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Raju vs Sajitha regarding offence U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act