Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1112/2022

Case between Raju V.K vs Suma P.V et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Raju V.K is the plaintiff while Suma P.V and others are the defendants. The suit has been dismissed as withdrawn by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh suit, due to absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Raju V.K (57 years years) Velikkakath house, Kadungmangalam P.O, Thiruvankulam (Via), Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 305.

Defendants

Suma P.V (45 years years) Thottuchira house, Kanichira Colony, Kureekkadu P.O, Thiruvankulam, Ernakulam District – 682 305. Shaji T.M (55 years years) Thottuchira house, Kanichira colony, Kureekkadu P.O, Thiruvankulam, Ernakulam District – 682 305. Vishnu T.S (30 years years) Thottuchira house, Kanichira colony, Kureekkadu P.O, Thiruvankulam, Ernakulam District – 682 305. Kerala State Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development Corporation (Age not specified years) District Office, Ernakulam Represented by its officer, Choolakkal Building, Thripunithura road, Vytilla P.O, Kochi – 682 019.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Evidence:
IA 5/23 allowed. Hence dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases