Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1112/2022

Case between Raju V.K vs Suma P.V et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-30
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 01/30/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Raju V.K is the plaintiff while Suma P.V and others are the defendants. The suit has been dismissed as withdrawn by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh suit, due to absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh suit, due to absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raju V.K
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suma P.V
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji T.M
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vishnu T.S
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala State Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development Corporation
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.R.Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Derick Mathai Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu Satheesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Urmila M.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sapna Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gayathri Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thahzeem A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aishwarya Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Evidence:
IA 5/23 allowed. Hence dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raju V.K vs Suma P.V et al regarding withdrawal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Raju V.K vs Suma P.V et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 01/30/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won