Case Summary
Raju B filed a suit against Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan and others. The suit was dismissed as not pressed during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed as the matter was deemed infractous, with all interim orders vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that matter has become infractous and hence not pressed the suit and endorsed the same.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raju B
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Kochi Kendra
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- E Ramankutty
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Principal, Bhavans Vidya Mandir
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- School Management Committee, Bhavans Vidya Mandir
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham K John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rahul Govind
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Latha Anand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K K Sajikumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rohit Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rishivarma T R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidharth P S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nirmal S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ria Elizabath Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Matter has become infractous and hence not pressed the suit.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that matter has become infractous and hence not pressed the suit and endorsed the same.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raju B vs Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Raju B vs Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan et al regarding dismissal of suit