Case Summary
The plaintiff, Rajmohan, filed a suit against the defendants Anandakrishnan and Arya for the realization of money. The case was heard on 30/10/2025 and the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.
Judgment Evidence:
Both side represented. Plaintiff not remitted balance court fee till date. Plaint rejected U/o 7 R.11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajmohan
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anandakrishnan
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arya
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.L Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Realisation of money
Evidence:
Plaint rejected U/o 7 R.11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Rajmohan vs Anandakrishnan et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Rajmohan vs Anandakrishnan et al regarding realisation of money