Case Summary
Rajisha.K. filed a suit for partition against Kunhipocker's family. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff was absent during the final hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Defendants represented. The name of plaintiff called absent. Hence, the suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajisha.K.
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- Daughter of Abdul Vahab
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhipocker's children
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit for partition dismissed with costs as plaintiff was absent
Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Defendants represented. The name of plaintiff called absent. Hence, the suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajisha.K. vs Kunhipocker's family regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Rajisha.K. vs Kunhipocker's family regarding partition