Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No 221/2016

Case between Raji.R.Nair vs M/s.Sathyan Finance et al regarding review of order

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-07-19
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Code No.
221
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Raji.R.Nair, filed a petition to review an order dated 06-01-2025. The respondents did not file any objection, and the court provided another opportunity to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for review was allowed by the court, restoring the application without any costs, as no objections were filed by the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
IA. 01/24 restored on file and thereby IA allowed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for review was allowed by the court, restoring the application without any costs, as no objections were filed by the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it in the interest of justice to grant the petitioner an opportunity.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found it in the interest of justice to grant the petitioner an opportunity.
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

In the results, IA. 01/24 restored on file and thereby IA allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raji.R.Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Sathyan Finance
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju Das
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindusha
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition was allowed to restore the IA on file.
Evidence:
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter. Hence petition allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/06/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won