Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 548/2021

Case between Rajeswary S Nair et al vs Narayanan Kutty et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Rajeswary S Nair, Sarojini S Nair, and Ramadevi Chandrashekar were involved in a suit against the defendants including Narayanan Kutty and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were continuously absent and did not represent themselves.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs who failed to represent themselves in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent, and no representation was made on their behalf, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rajeswary S Nair (63 years years) Kalezhathu house, Eramalloor P.O,Cherthala Sarojini S Nair (62 years years) Block No. 55 H. No. 562 Kuttzoone Gandhidham Post 370 230, Gujarat Ramadevi Chandrashekar (60 years years) Plot No. 218, Sector 7, Gandhidharam Kath Gujarath – 370 201

Defendants

Narayanan Kutty (a) Lakshmi Narayanan (62 years years) Thekkepadath house, Chottanikara Post, Pin – 682 312 Sheela Anil (50 years years) Dev Deya Perumbalam Post, Pin – 688 570, Ernakulam District Sheeba S Nair (48 years years) Dev Deya Perumbalam Post, Pin – 688 570, Ernakulam District Raghunandanan (65 years years) Thikanaparambu, Panangadu P.O, Pin – 682 506 Unnikrishnan (65 years years) Thrikanaparambu, Panangadu P.O, Pin – 682 506

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, not represented. No steps seen taken against Defendant 1 so far. No representation for the plaintiff continuously. Plaintiff also absent. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases