O.S. No.1315/2018

Case between Rajesh.K. vs A.T. Thankappan et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court

II Additional Munsiff Court

Judge

Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran

Order Date

2024-03-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajesh.K. filed a suit against A.T. Thankappan and Anirudhan. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not interested in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the repeated absence of the plaintiff, indicating a lack of interest in proceeding.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence showed no intention to pursue the case.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rajesh.K.
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o late Krishnan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: A.T. Thankappan
Party Age: 80
Relation: S/o late Thevan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anirudhan
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o Thankappan

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Anilkumar.P.V.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Saritha.D.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Rajitha.M.K.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M.S. Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K. Sunil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Plaintiff's suit dismissed for default due to absence.

Evidence:

Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification