Case Summary
The plaintiffs Rajendran Pillai and Prasanna Kumari filed a suit for injunction against defendants Vanaja and Padmini Amma. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not present any evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce any evidence.
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce any evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Today the case is listed for trial. As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajendran Pillai
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna Kumari
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vanaja
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Padmini Amma
- Party Age
- 72
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Soja Thulaseedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajendran Pillai et al vs Vanaja et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rajendran Pillai et al vs Vanaja et al regarding Injunction