Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1953/2016

Case between Rajappan et al vs Janamma et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration
Case Code No.
1953
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Rajappan and his family against Janamma and others. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of instruction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and there was no instruction from the plaintiff, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and there was no instruction from the plaintiff, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of instructions resulted in the case being dismissed.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. represented. Counsel prays represented. Counsel for plaintiff submitted that there is no instruction from the part of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajappan
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joy.R
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lekha.R
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suman.R
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janamma
Party Age
85
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bharathi
Party Age
81
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maniyankutty
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pappi
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Thirumala.K.Bijukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S. Rajeev Chempakassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of instructions.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that there is no instruction from the part of the plaintiff. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won