Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.713/2020

Case between Rajan T.N. vs Ravi T.N. regarding abatement of suit

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-03
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 09/03/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajan T.N. is the plaintiff and Ravi T.N. is the defendant. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to take steps after the defendant was reported deceased.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and failure to implead the legal representatives of the deceased defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and failure to implead the legal representatives of the deceased defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear and failed to take necessary legal steps.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear and failed to take necessary legal steps.
Supporting Evidence
No steps seen taken so far to take steps to implead the LR's of the sole defendant, who was reported to be no more on 05.04.2024.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed as abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan T.N.
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ravi T.N.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.K. Sreevalsakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bijukumar C.R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as abated due to no representation and steps taken to implead the legal representatives of the sole defendant who is no more.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed as abated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajan T.N. vs Ravi T.N. regarding abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan T.N. vs Ravi T.N. regarding abatement of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/03/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won