Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 61/2022

Case between Rajan et al vs Vijayagopal regarding possession and payment.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajan and Prayaga are the plaintiffs seeking possession and monetary compensation from the defendant, Vijayagopal. The parties resolved their disagreements through mediation, leading to a formal agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation agreement reached between the parties and decreed the suit accordingly.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall handover vacant possession of the shop rooms and pay Rs. 60,000/-.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation agreement reached between the parties and decreed the suit accordingly.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful and acceptable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful and acceptable.
Supporting Evidence
The parties have settled their disputes through mediation discussions conducted at mediation sub center Varkala. The court heard and perused the records including the mediation agreement. Mediation report is accepted. Since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement as follows: 1.The defendant shall handover vacant possession of the shop rooms to the plaintiffs forthwith. 2.The defendant shall pay Rs. 60,000/- (Sixty thousand only) on or before 25.12.2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prayaga
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayagopal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Krishna Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall handover vacant possession of the shop rooms to the plaintiffs forthwith.
Evidence:
The defendant shall handover vacant possession of the shop rooms to the plaintiffs forthwith.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay Rs. 60,000/- (Sixty thousand only) on or before 25.12.2025.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay Rs. 60,000/- (Sixty thousand only) on or before 25.12.2025.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajan et al vs Vijayagopal regarding possession and payment.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan et al vs Vijayagopal regarding possession and payment.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won