Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction against three defendants which was ultimately dismissed due to the parties reaching a settlement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the settlement reached between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Why Defendant Won:
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Matter settled between parties. Plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Makku
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Beerankutty
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o. Vaderi Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
- Party Age
- 63
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noushad
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariyamu
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o. Saithalavi
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking an injunction against the defendants
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Matter settled between parties. Plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajan et al vs Kunhimuhammed et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan et al vs Kunhimuhammed et al regarding injunction