Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.633/2012

Case between Rajamany vs Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Biotechnology et al regarding dismissal of suit not pressed

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-04
Duration
Case Code No.
633
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajamany, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Biotechnology and the State of Kerala. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the plaintiff filed a not press memo.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff as not pressed after a memo was filed. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff as not pressed after a memo was filed. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajamany
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Biotechnology
Relation
represented its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by Chief Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Not press memo
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Varkala B. Ravikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sunil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S.J. Rajaprathap
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Lekshmi Sree.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.S. Laila Mohan Das
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth Pai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rex D.G
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won