Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Raj Mohan and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Vasu and Seena. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of a proof affidavit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and had not filed a required proof affidavit. Consequently, the case was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to submit a proof affidavit.
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to submit a proof affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to submit a proof affidavit.
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to submit a proof affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent and that no proof affidavit was filed, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in Open Court on this the 5th day of June, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raj Mohan
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sheena Raj Mohan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chinthu Raj Mohan
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nandu Raj Mohan
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasu
- Party Age
- 86
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seena
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.C.Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.N.Sankerjee
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.N.Madhu Sudanan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Udaya Jyothi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Keerthi B Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K.Vijayan Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.Nitheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.M.Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raj Mohan et al vs Vasu et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Raj Mohan et al vs Vasu et al regarding dismissal for default.