Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 462/2019

Case between Rahul P.R vs Jose Mampilly regarding suit hearing.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rahul P.R is the plaintiff, while Jose Mampilly is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case since the plaintiff was absent and did not take steps for representation or evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rahul P.R (29 years years) Poopattuparambil House, Vattakattu Road, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam Districrt, Kaloor, Kochi – 682017

Defendants

Jose Mampilly (53 years years) 4-F, Pavlon Apartments, Edappally P.O, Pin- 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's case was dismissed due to absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant present. Listed case. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence nor has taken steps. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases