Case Summary
Raghu V N filed a suit against Dittan. The case has been resolved through mediation, and the terms of the mediation agreement have been accepted by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed based on the terms of the mediation agreement, which was accepted by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the terms of the mediation agreement were settled and accepted by both parties.
The court found that the terms of the mediation agreement were settled and accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the terms of the mediation agreement were settled and accepted by both parties.
The court found that the terms of the mediation agreement were settled and accepted by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of Mediation agreement is found to be settled.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of Mediation agreement.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raghu V N
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dittan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M P Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepak S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K S Akshay
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gentle C D
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil S Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anila Peter
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P Radhika Rajasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sneha S Menon
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Simi S Ali
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Haris K K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of Mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of Mediation agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raghu V N vs Dittan regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Raghu V N vs Dittan regarding a civil suit
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement